BTW, is there a particular reason for the article to be included in the Reformed Perspecives Magazine?
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Perisseuo
|
Matthew 24, Part 1 |
Lead | ||
|
I assume the main goal in Ralph Woodrow's article, "Matthew 24" is arguiing against the Futuristic view of the prophecy in Matthew 24. I agree
with the faults of the Futuristic explanations in prophecy; yet I find his take on their either being a Futuristic view or a Finalized view on Matthew 24 as
shortchanging other more viable views. I thought much of the prophecy in Matthew 24 as being on-going with a spike toward Christ's return. Why does it
either have to be futuristic or finalized?
BTW, is there a particular reason for the article to be included in the Reformed Perspecives Magazine?
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." (Colossians 2:7 NASB) |
||||
|
|
||||
rodkirby |
#1 | |||
|
I tend to look at Matt. 24 as Kik did (I think I remember that -- or maybe I am "misremembering"). Matt. 24 falls into two parts, following the
question of the disciples "(1) When will these things (the things Jesus just mentioned -- the destruction of Jerusalem) be, and (2) what will be the sign
of your coming and of the close of the age?" While the disciples probably thought this was all one complex event, Jesus divided it into two parts.
First is vs. 4-35, which deals with the destruction of Jerusalem. Note the time marker in vs. 34 -- "this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." The only verse in that section which I believe doesn't deal with the 70AD events is verse 27: "As the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man." But in the context that makes sense. Jesus is warning the disciples not to listen to those who will falsely say Christ has returned during their own generation, saying He has come secretly and is hidden in the wilderness or in some secluded room (vs. 26). To paraphrase vs. 27, "Listen -- when I come back, I won't do it secretly. The whole world will know about it, just like when lightning lightens up the whole sky. There will be no way to miss it when I come back, so don't listen to those who say I've secretly returned." Then there's a shift in vs. 36 -- "but concerning THAT day and hour now one knows..." Jesus has just given all kinds of signs for the disciples to watch for -- false Christs, Jerusalem surrounded by armies, etc. The destruction of Jerusalem would be accompanied by many signs, and would happen in their lifetime. Not so His return and the end of the age. No signs there, no warnings beforehand -- people will be living normal lives just like in the days of Noah. Jesus will just appear, like when a thief comes unannounced. Therefore, we are always to be ready for His coming, since we don't know the time. That just seems to be a plain, reasonable framework for understanding Matt. 24, and things seem to fall into place and make sense on that basis.
Rod Kirby, Ph.D.
Dominion Christian High School Marietta, GA dominionchristian.org |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#2 | |||
BTW, is there a particular reason for the article to be included in the Reformed Perspecives Magazine? Because this series is an accepted perspective in some Reformed circles. While I do not agree with all his views (historicism), but does well in some respects against dispys ..... that was my purpose, but I may need to reconsider ....
In Christ,
5 Solas
Last Edited By: 5 Solas 02/29/08 22:00:11.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Perisseuo |
#3 | |||
|
What's the difference between the preterist and historicist positions?
Woodrow in part 1 'Finalized' position appears to take the preteriest position.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." (Colossians 2:7 NASB) |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#4 | |||
|
I decided to remove the article. I liked and desired the article because in this series he does a great job against dispys. However, in you asking your
question I saw my temporary blindness to his so-called preterist outlook.
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
Perisseuo |
#5 | |||
|
Joe,
Don't remove it on my account. I was just wondering what other positions are called and described. Woodrow's 'Finalized' appears to be very similar, if not, to the preterist position. What is the historicist position? Would a-mills and some post-mills incorporate other position into their reading of Matthew 24 prophecies. I take it that all pre-mills would take the Futurist position.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." (Colossians 2:7 NASB) |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#6 | |||
|
John,
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
Perisseuo |
#7 | |||
|
Joe,
Sadden to hear of your illness. In what ways can we pray? I have this commentary by Leon Morris, and he separates into 4 principal ways Revelation has been interpreted. 1) Preterist, 2) Historicist, 3) Futurist, & 4) Idealist. Therefore, I had thought the Preterist and the Historicist positions are different. I'm not a person who digs deeply into the inner-details of these kinds of theological constructs, but stay in the somewhat broad parameters of them. Morris ends his description of Peterist as saying most modern scholars hold to some variation of it (Preterism).
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." (Colossians 2:7 NASB) |
||||
|
|
||||
rodkirby |
#8 | |||
|
Terms are used in different ways by different people. When Morris uses "preterist" he means those who see the book of Revelation as primarily (or
exclusively) referring to events leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. He would use "historicist" to mean a view that the book of
Revelation gives an overview of the entire sweep of history between the first and second comings. "Futurist" would mean the book of Revelation is
primarily (or exclusively) dealing with events in the future -- primarily centered around the second coming complex of events, however that is seen (premil,
pretrib, dispie, etc.). And "idealist" would see Revelation as giving general principles which are applicable to all times, but not specific
prophecies of specific events.
Rod Kirby, Ph.D.
Dominion Christian High School Marietta, GA dominionchristian.org |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#9 | |||
|
I appreciate your prayers. Gout in any form is incurable, though in most cases controllable - for some more than others. Thus, short of a miracle, pray that it may be controlled, the pain regulated, and that I may be able to stop taking steroids - side effects ….. Also, that I may maintain employment. Again, I appreciate your prayers.
I believe Rod answered the rest of your questions.
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
docs1 |
Signs attendant to Christ's coming | #10 | ||
|
Hi,
I'm pretty new here. Perisseuo recommended this forum to me and I appreciate the fact that he did. I like the site and I have read some of the articles in the magazine. I am also aware that sickness has been spoken of in this thread and I didn't know whether to start another topic or not but my questions do come from Matthew 24 so I went ahead and continued in this thread. I'm also fearful of jumping in over my head here on this forum and on this subject. But Mr. Kirby stated above: < Then there's a shift in vs. 36 -- "but concerning THAT day and hour now one knows..." Jesus has just given all kinds of signs for the disciples to watch for -- false Christs, Jerusalem surrounded by armies, etc. The destruction of Jerusalem would be accompanied by many signs, and would happen in their lifetime. Not so His return and the end of the age. No signs there, no warnings beforehand -- people will be living normal lives just like in the days of Noah. Jesus will just appear, like when a thief comes unannounced. Therefore, we are always to be ready for His coming, since we don't know the time. Although no one knows the hour or day as Mr.Kirby correctly stated, do those statements mean to imply that there will be no signs or clues whatsoever as regards Christ's second coming and that it will happen suddenly and without the slightest sign or hint of imminence? I'm presently trying hard to understand amillennialism and I thought, although disagreeing on the millennium, that the premill and the amill view agree that there would be a time of apostasy and turmoil at the end of the age and the man of lawlessness and sin would appear. II Thessalonians 2:1-12 covers the day of the Lord and the man of lawlessness who will be destroyed by the Lord at His coming - II Thessalonians 2:8 - "And then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;" I'm not trying to suggest that we should be overly concerned with who the man of sin and lawlessness might be and sit around playing a guessing game as to his identity. It's just that his appearance and eventual treachery are set in the context of many other events by the Bible and it seems that at least a clue of some sorts could be gleamed from these. I don't believe in a secret rapture that happens before the actual second coming and I won't even consider playing a guessing game there as to when. But I think some type of a picture, although not totally understood, can be gleamed from scripture as to conditions and definite events that even Jesus spoke of that will transpire when these things begin to take place at the end of the age that culminates in His second advent. We may be in the dark as the actual day and hour but that doesn't mean I think that we will be totally left in the dark. Scripture can be a great aid there. I'm just asking and I realize as happens many times I may have perhaps misread some of the comments I referred to. Anyway, I'm open for replies and the like. Discussions are good. "But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that the day should overtake you like a thief." (II Thessalonians 5:4) "Doc" "for it is God who is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure." (Philippians 2:13)
Last Edited By: docs1 03/16/08 12:58:51.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Matthew 24, Part 1 | 02/29/08 16:19:03 | Perisseuo |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 02/29/08 19:23:22 | rodkirby |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 02/29/08 21:47:21 | 5 Solas |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 02/29/08 22:11:18 | Perisseuo |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 02/29/08 22:26:15 | 5 Solas |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 02/29/08 23:58:15 | Perisseuo |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 03/01/08 01:24:43 | 5 Solas |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 03/01/08 09:30:43 | Perisseuo |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 03/01/08 10:30:13 | rodkirby |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 03/01/08 19:49:42 | 5 Solas |
| Signs attendant to Christ's coming | 03/16/08 12:54:43 | docs1 |
| Re: Matthew 24, Part 1 | 03/21/08 15:15:56 | 5 Solas |
|
|