| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
MarkNZ
|
Tithing |
Lead | ||
|
I tithed for many years but now don't believe it is scriptural. Of all the scripture in the bible on tithing, none of it is addressed to the church, only
Israel so what are peoples views on this?
|
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#1 | |||
|
So whar relationship, if any, do you see between the Church and Israel ?
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#2 | |||
|
I believe we are separate groups, born again believers and Israel but of course we pray for them.
But not everything in the old testament we obey, e.g. (sacrifices). If its been replaced in the New Testament then we do it the new way. (2 cor.9:7) in regards to giving. Nowhere is the church told to tithe. (Mathew 23:23 and Luke 11: 42) are still under the old covenant. Theres no suggestion anywhere that implies the early church tithed. They took up offerings, collections and gave from their hearts (spirit led). |
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
mans | #3 | ||
|
For example: Before the tithe is taken in my church, someone gets up and qoutes something like Malachi 6-10.
But in Malachi 1:1 it says that it is addressed to Israel and meaning Israel as a nation. That scripture has been fulfilled for them, they have been abundantly blessed as in Solomans days, I haven't seen a christain so blessed that he can't contain it. To me that is obviously for the nation of Israel and not for the church. As for bringing the whole tithe into the storehouse most churchs point to themselves as that place. Considering church buildings didn't come into about the 4th century why would it mean that. Another point: the original tithe wasn't meant for the upkeep of buildings, no wonder most churchs are struggling.
Last Edited By: MarkNZ 03/16/08 23:57:28.
Edited 2 times.
|
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#4 | |||
So, what about verses such as:
In Christ,
5 Solas
Last Edited By: 5 Solas 03/19/08 16:25:52.
Edited 2 times.
|
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#5 | |||
|
I have an NIV, looked up the 1st one and says assembly in mine. However, I'm more interested in the tithing debate.
It's such a controversial one. I used to tithe and when I did I used to defend it with a passion but after having studied up on it I find so much evidence against it being a new covenant practice. You'de think there would be some suggestions that the early christians tithed ( no suggestions that the disciples tithed).Being such an important thing in the old testament you would think it would be more clear. |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#6 | |||
MarkNZ wrote: I understand your question is about tithing. However, not only is the answer to your question important, but how you get there is just as important. Note:
before you ever posted your question I posted this concerning "offerings":
It is sometimes argued that the tithe is no longer applicable in the New Testament era, but that the rule of giving generously and cheerfully now applies. However, the New Testament nowhere revokes the command to tithe, and Jesus himself affirms it (Matt. 23:23; Luke 11:42). Moreover, the passage generally used to support this argument (2 Cor. 9:7), does not apply to tithes, but to a special gift for the needy. Of course, the New Testament also affirms the need to care for the poor apart from using the tithe (Matt. 6:3-4; 19:21; Mark 10:21; Luke 14:13; 18:22; 19:8; Gal. 2:10; Jam. 2:1-17). However, what I am attempting to have you discover is that your methodology for getting the answer is in error. Look and the Greek of the verses and you will discover that what you see translated "assembly" is "church." I would suggest reading http://thirdmill.org/newfiles/wil_hendriksen/wil_hendriksen.Israel.html
In Christ,
5 Solas
Last Edited By: 5 Solas 03/20/08 08:37:24.
Edited 3 times.
|
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#7 | |||
|
Matthew 23:23 and Luke 11:42 are old covenant and spoken to pharisees.
Jesus is the head of the church and as the head comes 1st the church couldn't possibly start until Jesus had died on that cross. However I'll go look up some of that other stuff you've recommended. By the way, there are other things that weren't revoked but we don't practice them. |
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#8 | |||
|
I read that Hendriksen piece and found this among it.
(Hence, for Paul the church, consisting of Jews and Gentiles who have accepted Christ as their Lord and Savior, is indeed Israel.) Of course Jews who have accepted Christ as their Lord and Savior are part of the church but those that haven't are not part of the church and that happens to be the majority at the moment. To be part of the genuine church people need to be born again which couldn't even begin to happen until Jesus had gone to the cross. |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#9 | |||
MarkNZ wrote: Evaluating Premillennialism, Part I
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#10 | |||
|
Found some more scripture:
Matthew 16:18 ( I will build my church.) future tense. Not, I am building or I have been building. Eph 2:20-21 (built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus as the chief cornerstone. |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#11 | |||
MarkNZ wrote: These English words, 'I will build' could easily mean to build something new; and the Greek word oikodomeo, which is used in this place, can mean to erect a new building. However, the Lexicons give several other meanings for oikodomeo: to rebuild; to repair; to renew; to restore; to name just a few. The word is used frequently in the NT with this meaning. Three familiar passages: (1) Matthew 23:29, 'ye build the tombs of the prophets' (the last of them died four centuries before Christ), where it clearly means restoring those sepulchers, and (2 & 3) Matthew 26:61 and 27:40, both refer to a temple thrown down which is to be rebuilt in three days. This word oikodomeo is used in all of these passages, and quite clearly means to rebuild or raise up again. A proof that it was not something totally new which our Lord said He would build upon this rock, but the raising up of the fallen sanctuary, is given by the first Church Council (Acts 15). James showed how God had visited the nations to take out of them a people for Himself, agreed fully with what God had promised through the prophets centuries before. He quoted from Amos 9:11-12, using the portions applying to the question before them. He introduced this quotation thus: "After these things I will return, And I will build again" (Acts 15:16, ASV). These words plainly point us back to the things God had just spoken of to the 'house of Israel' in Amos 9: 7-10, in which He called them progressively 'the children of Israel', 'Israel' (the nation), the 'house of Jacob,' and then the 'house of Israel.' God assured the 'house of Israel' by name that He would not entirely destroy that house, but He would cause them to move to and fro 'among the nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth' (Amos 9: 9). Indeed, as Paul says the church is built upon the
foundation of the apostles and PROPHETS (plural), Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; (Eph.
2:20-21). Your proof text!
Time for bed
In Christ,
5 Solas
Last Edited By: 5 Solas 03/20/08 22:11:04.
Edited 2 times.
|
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#12 | |||
|
(Indeed, Christ is the Head of the Church and he was the one speaking in Matthew above -- thus the Church was already present. Moreover, Christ the Head of the
Church has been around for some time -- well before His incarnation. )
Just one more point re.above: I know he was from the beginning but he had to die and rise 1st before the church could start. The Holy Spirit had to come at the day of pentecost which i believe is the beginning of the church. We are born again of the holy spirit therefore until he came there could be no church. Anyway have a happy easter. |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#13 | |||
MarkNZ wrote: Where in scripture do you see that Christ had to die "first" before the Church could have a any beginning?
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#14 | |||
|
(Acts 2:41 states, "They then that received his word were baptized: and there were added unto them in that day about three
thousand souls" and Acts 2:47, .... "And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved." A thing must
first exist before anything can be added to it.)
It did exist, the day of pentecost started just before there, Acts 2, and then the harvest started coming in. (Acts 1:16; 1:20; 2:16; 2:25; 2:29; 2:34, etc. Don't know what these scriptures are supposed to refer to? |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#15 | |||
|
Yes, the Church was already present, but not because of Pentecost (where is it that you read that Pentecost is the beginning of the church - which "exact" text, or is this merely your assumption?). The very author of Acts reveals that during Stephen's defense before the Sanhedrin, he referred to Israel after the exodus as "the Church in the wilderness." Acts 7:38 states, "This is he that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel that spake to him in the Mount Sinai, and with our fathers: who received living oracles to give unto us." Stephen was referring to passages like the following: Deuteronomy 9:10 And the LORD delivered unto me two tables of stone written with the finger of God; and on them was written according to all the words, which the LORD spake with you in the mount out of the midst of the fire in the day of the Church. (LXX) "Ekklesia" (Church) is found numerous times in the LXX. The church was already present to be added unto in Acts 2, because it was being rebuilt,
restructured, etc. It was already in existence! Moreover, the day of Pentecost was a partial fulfillment of Joel 2:27f given to the assembly (2:16) of Israel -
the Church.
Wayne Grudem states it clearer than I do:
It is time to disappear for family time - long weekend. Maybe
someone else will pick up the mantel and reveal to you even further the realities of Israel and the church.
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#16 | |||
|
I also believe the old testiment saints are in heaven but believe the Church started at the day of Pentecost.
I believe when the old testament saints died they went to paradise (opposite hell, as in the story of the rich man and Lazarus) and that when Christ descended and then ascended it says in Eph:4:8 he led captives in his train (which in my interpretation means the old testament saints), he took them up to heaven. Israel cannot possibly be interpreted as the church as you need to be born again to be part of the church, and we all know that the nation of Israel ( apart from messianic Jews) is certainly not christian. Anyway, I guess we have different views on that one so will have to leave it at that and i hope you enjoy your holiday. |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#17 | |||
Where is the scriptural evidence that "the Church started at the day of Pentecost?" I have asked this numerous times and yet no scripture??? We know that mere assumptions are not above scripture, so where is the scripture??? MarkNZ stated, Here you are failing to distinguish between the: (1) visible church and (2) invisible church. The visible church contains both those lost and saved. It contains OC individuals like Esau and Ishmael - lost, but covenant members. It also includes those our Lord spoke about saying, "not everyone that sayeth unto me Lord, Lord, … (Matt.5:21 f) and John saying. "they went out from us that they may be manifest they ere not of us …" (1 John 2:18-19; e.g. Rom. 9:6; 2 Pet. 2). I'm sure you would admit that many in today's churches are not saved either. Thus, Israel meets the definitions of the visible church. Some in Israel were saved, others lost. The invisible church is all the elect from the foundation of the world. This church contains only the saved. This includes only those that were/are saved - all the elect - Jew and Gentile throughout all generations. We in the visible church do not know who all these are. Moreover, you are failing to distinguish
between national Israel and what we may call spiritual Israel - or if it is easier even
Christian Israel (Rom. 2:28-29). Scripture clearly states, "Abraham
believed God, and it was reckoned unto him for righteousness" (Gal. 3:6-7). He had the Gospel preached to him (Gal. 3:8 ).
Hebrews 11 contains a long list of individuals saved by faith and in the church which the writer of Hebrews attempts to use (Heb. 12:1-2) to encourage NC
believers. MarkNZ stated, Yes, it is evident that we have different views, but it is significant in that taking an unscriptural view on Israel may lead to sin - i.e. like alleging one does not need to tithe, etc.
In Christ,
5 Solas |
||||
|
|
||||
MarkNZ |
#18 | |||
|
Scripture has to be interpreted, sometimes the answers are in other parts of the bible, sometimes not, ( re. the church starting at pentecost ) thats the only
thing that makes sense to me and I believe thats quite a popular interpretation.
I agree with you on some of those things your saying. I also agree Abraham and other old testament saints are in heaven now but before Christ paid the price they were in paradise. National and spiritual Israel-Sorry if i interpreted what you were meaning there. We do have some different interpretations and opinions but I'd rather leave it there, thanks for your time and input. Mark. |
||||
|
|
||||
5 Solas |
#19 | |||
|
| ||||