In Jim Ellis' article What is Hyper-Calvinism, he points out the primary two erros in hyper-calvinism as "a denial of duty-faith and a denial
of the universal call of the gospel". While those may be the two that originally brought about the term, hyper-calvinism, I thought the rejection of
common grace was one of the big bug-a-boo's with hyper-calvinism along with the rejection of the 'general call'. The neglect of common grace leads
them to mis-portray God in His benevolences toward the world. The rejection of the 'general call' leads them to retreat from any form or mention of
evangelism.




