all of the Protestant Reformers and the entire Reformed and Lutheran traditions are amillennial
My understanding is that, at the time of the Reformation, there were basically two eschatological positions -- chiliasts (comparable to premils) and non-chiliasts (everyone else). The reformers would have been non-chiliasts, meaning they did not believe in a literal 1000-year physical reign of Christ on earth prior to the general resurrection and the end of the age. But otherwise they really didn't deal with our current distinctions, particularly between amils and postmils. You can find teachings by the Reformers which lean toward the postmil view, and you can find other teachings which would be more in line with our current amil view. But those positions had not been crystallized as they are today.
Since I'm not a church historian nor a student of historical theology, I stand to be corrected by those of you who are. Is my understanding correct?



