<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Matthew 24, Part 1 </title>
        <link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/topic/952/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I assume the main goal in Ralph Woodrow&#39;s article, &quot;Matthew 24&quot; is arguiing against the Futuristic view of the prophecy in Matthew 24. I agree
with the faults of the Futuristic explanations in prophecy; yet I find his take on their either being a Futuristic view or a Finalized view on Matthew 24 as
shortchanging other more viable views.  I thought much of the prophecy in Matthew 24 as being on-going with a spike toward Christ&#39;s return. Why does it
either have to be... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:15:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4553/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4553</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I believe these sermons will help:
<br>
<br>

<p><strong>Dr. Kim Riddlebarger</strong> (he critiques Dispy very well)
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://thirdmill.org/sermons/compile_speaker.asp/speaker/Kim%20Riddlebarger/site/iiim/category/speakers">http://thirdmill.org/sermons/compile_speaker.asp/speaker/Kim%20Riddlebarger/site/iiim/category/speakers</a></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (5 Solas)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4553</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:15:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4530/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4530</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi,
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m pretty new here. Perisseuo recommended this forum to me and I appreciate the fact that he did. I like the site and I have read some of the articles in
the magazine. I am also aware that sickness has been spoken of in this thread and I didn&#39;t know whether to start another topic or not but my questions do
come from Matthew 24 so I went ahead and continued in this thread. I&#39;m also fearful of jumping in over my head here on this forum and on this subject.
<br>
<br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (docs1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4530</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4506/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4506</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">I appreciate your prayers. Gout in any form is incurable, though in most cases controllable - for some more
than others. Thus, short of a miracle, pray that it may be controlled, the pain regulated, and that I may be able to stop taking steroids<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> - side effects ….. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Also, that I may maintain employment. Again, I appreciate your
prayers.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (5 Solas)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4506</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4505/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4505</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Terms are used in different ways by different people. When Morris uses &quot;preterist&quot; he means those who see the book of Revelation as primarily (or
exclusively) referring to events leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. He would use &quot;historicist&quot; to mean a view that the book of
Revelation gives an overview of the entire sweep of history between the first and second comings. &quot;Futurist&quot; would mean the book of Revelation is
primarily (or exclusively)... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rodkirby)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4505</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4504/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Joe,
<br>
<br>
Sadden to hear of your illness. In what ways can we pray?
<br>
<br>
I have this commentary by Leon Morris, and he separates into 4 principal ways Revelation has been interpreted. 1) Preterist, 2) Historicist, 3) Futurist, &amp;
4) Idealist. Therefore, I had thought the Preterist and the Historicist positions are different. I&#39;m not a person who digs deeply into the inner-details of
these kinds of theological constructs, but stay in the somewhat broad parameters of them.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Perisseuo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4504</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:30:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4503/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4503</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font size="3">John,
<br></font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font size="3"><br>
I re-read the article earlier tonight and it is too preterist/<span style="COLOR: #330000">historicist (the same)</span> to have on our site. I am glad you
said something.</font></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY:... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (5 Solas)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4503</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4502/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4502</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Joe,
<br>
<br>
Don&#39;t remove it on my account. I was just wondering what other positions are called and described. Woodrow&#39;s &#39;Finalized&#39; appears to be very
similar, if not, to the preterist position. What is the historicist position? Would a-mills and some post-mills incorporate other position into their reading
of Matthew 24 prophecies. I take it that all pre-mills would take the Futurist position. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Perisseuo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4502</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4501/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4501</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I decided to remove the article. I liked and desired the article because in this series he does a great job against dispys. However, in you asking your
question I saw my temporary blindness to his so-called preterist outlook. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (5 Solas)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4501</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4500/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4500</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What&#39;s the difference between the preterist and historicist positions?  
<br>
<br>
Woodrow in part 1 &#39;Finalized&#39; position appears to take the preteriest position. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Perisseuo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4500</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4499/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4499</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  BTW, is there a particular reason for the article to be included in the Reformed Perspecives Magazine?
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Because this series is an accepted perspective in some Reformed circles. While I do not agree with all his views (historicism), but does well in some respects
against dispys ..... that was my purpose, but I may need to reconsider .... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (5 Solas)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4499</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:47:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/4497/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html#reply-4497</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I tend to look at Matt. 24 as Kik did (I think I remember that -- or maybe I am &quot;misremembering&quot;). Matt. 24 falls into two parts, following the
question of the disciples &quot;(1) When will these things (the things Jesus just mentioned -- the destruction of Jerusalem) be, and (2) what will be the sign
of your coming and of the close of the age?&quot; While the disciples probably thought this was all one complex event, Jesus divided it into two parts.
<br>
<br>
First is vs. 4-35,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rodkirby)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/4497</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Matthew 24, Part 1  ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/topic/952/t/Matthew-24-Part-1.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I assume the main goal in Ralph Woodrow&#39;s article, &quot;Matthew 24&quot; is arguiing against the Futuristic view of the prophecy in Matthew 24. I agree
with the faults of the Futuristic explanations in prophecy; yet I find his take on their either being a Futuristic view or a Finalized view on Matthew 24 as
shortchanging other more viable views.  I thought much of the prophecy in Matthew 24 as being on-going with a spike toward Christ&#39;s return. Why does it
either have to be... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Perisseuo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/topic/952</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>