<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Age of the universe</title>
        <link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/topic/534/t/Age-of-the-universe.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Since the scientific method operates by induction, it cannot provide us with deductive certainty, but even so, it seems rather unlikely that any discovery will entirely controvert the current estimates of the age of the universe. As that estimate is refined, it may get longer or shorter by non-trivial time spans, but I daresay it will not decrease from billions of years to anywhere near the range of a young earth as advocated by some creationists -- ten thousand years. This latter view, it is... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 21:18:35 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1052/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1052</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Where in Genesis do you get the idea that the word &quot;day&quot; is a metiphor for something else.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->You can find more detailed descriptions of the framework theory and related links in the earlier posts in this thread. The exegetical case is made succinctly <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.upper-register.com/other_studies/framework_interpretation.html">here</a><!--EZCODE... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthaeus Flexibilis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1052</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 21:18:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1051/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1051</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I answer this as a young-earther, who believes &quot;yom&quot; in Gen. 1 means a 24-hour day. But the framework people are not treating Gen. 1 as an allegory, in which every element or word of the text has a specific referent to some other specific thing. Instead, as Ra pointed out, it is an extended metaphor -- the passage as a whole teaches God's creative power, etc., without saying anything about the length of a &quot;yom.&quot; <br><br>It's similar to Jesus' parables. Think about the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rodkirby)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1051</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 06:57:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1050/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1050</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ [quote]The framework view does not deny this. In fact, the framework view affirms it. But it takes the whole passage as a conceit, an extended metaphor. <br><br>For the sake of comparison, consider the way parables work. In the parable of the sower, it is clear that the word "seed" means seed. Jesus is talking about a person sowing seeds. But his point is not about seeds, it is about the gospel. So, the word should be translated as "seed," but it must be interpreted as "the gospel of the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1050</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:43:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1049/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>However, in Genesis chapter one it must be interpreted as a 24 hour period.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->The framework view does not deny this. In fact, the framework view affirms it. But it takes the whole passage as a conceit, an extended metaphor. <br><br>For the sake of comparison, consider the way parables work. In the parable of the sower, it is clear that the word &quot;seed&quot; means seed. Jesus is... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ramclaughlin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1049</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:42:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1048/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1048</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ One of the main reasons why I believe in a young earth is how the Hebrew word Yom (day) is used in Genesis chapter one. <br>Consider the following.<br><br><br>Normally &quot;yom&quot; is used in Scripture to mean a 24 hour day. But there are exceptions such as Is. 61:2 where it is used for longer periods of time. Or in the case of Genesis 2:4, where it is used as an idiom &quot;when&quot;.<br>However, in Genesis chapter one it must be interpreted as a 24 hour period.<br>1.) Elsewhere,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1048</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1047/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1047</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It's a fair point. I still tend to favor an old earth in conjunction with the framework interpretation for the reasons mentioned previously (in this context, particularly the &quot;I could have done it this way, but didn't&quot; reason), but <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.pcanet.org/history/creation/report.html">like the PCA</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> as a denomination, I can appreciate the other views, too. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthaeus Flexibilis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1047</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1043/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1043</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, that's part of the problem of talking about &quot;seeing&quot; anything in space. What we're actually seeing is light that emanated from an object that used to be there, but that may since have moved or even been destroyed.<br><br>I simply meant that, phenomenologically, we can &quot;see&quot; the stars. But in point of fact, if God created light in transit from stars billions of light years away, there would be little reason to create the stars themselves. After all, we will never... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ramclaughlin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1043</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1071/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1071</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I hate handles whose significance I can make out.  I do not, however, transfer that antipathy to the person behind the handle. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :p --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tongue.gif ALT=":p"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <div class='signature'>~Jane~<!--EZCODE BR START--><br /><!--EZCODE BR END--><!--EZCODE BR START--><br /><!--EZCODE BR END--><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:small;">Suddenly I was abuzz with ideas.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goldberry of Withywindle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1071</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:54:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1046/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ your method assumes we have to look at things and judge their ages, and that tells us their apparent ages. Therefore, that causes a conflict.<br><br>I am saying that the Word that tells us how things were created tells us their ages -- that is, the ages of those things that were created at that time, as opposed to the ages of things that were generated later by the mechanisms inaugurated at creation. It explains away the conflict, by simply asserting that it was an exception to what we might... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goldberry of Withywindle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1046</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1042/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ that since the earth was created as the home of man, and the stars exist to give light to the earth, it's not unreasonable to give the stars a little &quot;boost&quot; of specially created light so that man can derive the benefit of the stars despite it taking time for the light to reach us ordinarily.<br><br>But my question was really, how can they be &quot;visible stars&quot; if the light has not yet reached us?  The only way something can be visible is if the light reflected or generated... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goldberry of Withywindle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1042</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1070/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1070</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Nice blog, except of course for the picture of the chomp! <br><br>And now I know what &quot;deins&quot; stands for! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ramclaughlin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1070</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:59:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1041/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1041</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The young earth interpretation of general and special revelation seems to require that light be attributed to stars even though it never actually came from the stars. This would be miraculous, and it is certainly within the realm of things God can do. But it doesn't seem to do justice to the purpose of the stars. <br><br>And it also doesn't seem to be implied by the text itself. The text seems to say that lights shine, and then we see them. It doesn't seem to envision a world in which the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ramclaughlin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1041</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:28:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1039/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1039</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Do you mean because under a young earth interpretation the light never actually emanated from those distant stars and the text seems to imply that that is their primary purpose?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->Yes. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ramclaughlin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1039</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:09:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1045/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1045</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>But we aren't left with reasoning from the current behavior of light to the apparent age of light.<br><br>We are explicitly told that God created light before He created anything else. So I don't think it raises that particular conundrum.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->Agreed. What I was trying to articulate is that it's not the <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>existence</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> of light that... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthaeus Flexibilis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1045</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:16:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1073/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1073</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ the cry of, &quot;They're trying to bring ID into the schools&quot; has been inaccurate in most of the cases I've seen.<br><br>Most of what I've seen is simply attempts to introduce into science education the theoretical possibility that a mechanism other than evolution, which could be ID but is not necessarily ID, is responsible for the current state of affairs. That they use the arguments of ID advocates to question evolution, does not mean that ID is being positively taught.<br><br>Yet so... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goldberry of Withywindle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1073</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1040/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ How can they be visible stars if their light never reaches the earth?<br><br>I mean, yeah, if they are too many light years away, then their light would never each the earth in a given amount of time.  But we all agree that we can see them, so how is it that their light has never reached the earth?<br><br>Either way, whether the earth is a jillion years old, or whether the light we see was created ex nihilo, while generated light continues to work its way toward us, we do see them.<br><br>As... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goldberry of Withywindle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1040</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1038/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1038</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Most visible stars never have and never will shed any light on the earth (unless the second coming is many billions of years in the future).<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->Do you mean because under a young earth interpretation the light never actually emanated from those distant stars and the text seems to imply that that is their primary purpose? <br><br>Some (perhaps) interesting footnotes: we are in an outer... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthaeus Flexibilis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1038</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:03:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1069/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1069</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, you might not like my latest blog then.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.bulletbobby.blogspot.com/">www.bulletbobby.blogspot.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deins)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1069</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1044/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1044</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Jane,<br><br>Keep up the good work.  Ultimately, it's not an issue of light from the stars anyway - it's an issue of biblical authority as the blurb below states.  Liberalism usually starts in the seminary and the pulpit - not the pew.  Then when you come on to internet discussion forums and disagree unbendingly and call unbelief what it is, you get publicly rebuked by easily irritated pontificates who contradict the Word and yet want to accuse others of arrogance.  I'm with you all the way... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deins)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1044</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:05:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/reply/1037/t/Age-of-the-universe.html#reply-1037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ we are still left with these two seemingly contrary facts:<br><br>1. God created the visible stars to shed light on the earth.<br>2. Most visible stars never have and never will shed any light on the earth (unless the second coming is many billions of years in the future). ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ramclaughlin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/sreply/1037</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Age of the universe ]]></title>
			<link>http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/topic/534/t/Age-of-the-universe.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Since the scientific method operates by induction, it cannot provide us with deductive certainty, but even so, it seems rather unlikely that any discovery will entirely controvert the current estimates of the age of the universe. As that estimate is refined, it may get longer or shorter by non-trivial time spans, but I daresay it will not decrease from billions of years to anywhere near the range of a young earth as advocated by some creationists -- ten thousand years. This latter view, it is... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthaeus Flexibilis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thirdmillennium49091.yuku.com/topic/534</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>